Regional distribution prevalence of heterotopic ossification in the elbow joint: a 3D study of patients after surgery for traumatic elbow injury.

BACKGROUND: Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a common complication after elbow fracture surgery and can lead to severe upper extremity disability. The radiographic localization of postoperative HO has been reported previously. However, there is no literature examining the distribution of postoperative HO at the three-dimensional (3D) level. This study aimed to investigate 1) the distribution characteristics of postoperative HO and 2) the possible risk factors affecting the severity of postoperative HO at a 3D level. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of patients who presented to our institution with HO secondary to elbow fracture between 13 January 2020 and 16 February 2023. Computed tomography scans of 56 elbows before elbow release surgery were reconstructed in 3D. HO was identified using density thresholds combined with manual identification and segmentation. The elbow joint and HO were divided into six regions according to three planes: the transepicondylar plane, the lateral ridge of the trochlear plane, and the radiocapitellar joint and coronoid facet plane. The differences in the volume of regional HO associated with different initial injuries were analyzed. RESULTS: Postoperative HO was predominantly present in the medial aspect of the capsule in 52 patients (93%), in the lateral aspect of the capsule in 45 patients (80%), in the medial supracondylar in 32 patients (57%), and in the lateral supracondylar, radial head, and ulnar region in the same number of 28 patients (50%). The median and interquartile range volume of total postoperative HO was 1683 (777-4894) mm3. The median and interquartile range volume of regional postoperative HO were: 584 (121-1454) mm3 at medial aspect of capsule, 207 (5-568) mm3 at lateral aspect of capsule, 25 (0-449) mm3 at medial supracondylar, 1 (0-288) at lateral supracondylar, 2 (0-478) at proximal radius and 7 (0-203) mm3 at the proximal ulna. In the subgroups with Injury Severity Score > or = 16, Gustilo-Anderson II, normal uric acid levels, elevated alkaline phosphatase, and body mass index > or = 24, the median HO volume exceeds that of the respective control groups. CONCLUSION: The medial aspect of the capsule was the area with the highest frequency and median volume of postoperative HO among all initial elbow injury types. Patients with higher Gustilo-Anderson grade, Injury Severity Score, alkaline phosphatase or Body Mass Index had higher median volume of postoperative HO.

Decreasing Trend in Upper Extremity Surfing Injuries Presenting to United States Emergency Departments - A 20-Year Analysis.

Surfing is a globally popular recreational sport with limited epidemiologic data. Currently, there is a paucity of literature regarding injury profiles and mechanisms of orthopaedic-related injuries. This study analyzed trends, etiologies, and diagnoses of upper extremity orthopaedic-related surfing injuries presenting to United States (US) emergency departments. The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database was accessed to query upper extremity surfing-related injuries presenting to US emergency departments from January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2021. Data were analyzed for year, body part, mechanism of injury, diagnosis, and disposition. National estimates were calculated based on the assigned statistical sample weight of each hospital. A total of 33 323 surfing-related injuries were included. The most common upper extremity body parts involved 15 169 shoulders (45.5%), 4220 fingers (12.7%), and 3753 hands (11.3%). The most common identifiable mechanisms of injuries were 7474 board-to-body (22.4%), 4188 impact with sand (12.6%), and 2639 impact with water (7.9%). Overuse constituted 7.2% of overall upper extremity injuries but 40% of strains. Only 2.2% of injuries required hospital admission. Between 2002 and 2021, there was a decreasing annual trend in upper extremity surfing-related injuries (P=.01). The decreasing trend in emergency department visits may be due to urgent care utilization and training for surfers and lifeguards to manage these injuries on-site, as the majority were minor given the small proportion requiring hospital admission. Chronic stress on rotator cuff and peri-scapular musculature while paddling in the prone position likely contributed to the large proportion of overuse injury.

The Boyd approach: a valuable alternative to treating simple to complex elbow fractures and dislocations.

BACKGROUND: The Boyd approach is a single-incision posterior approach to the proximal radius and ulna based on a lateral anconeus muscle reflection and release of the lateral collateral ligamentous complex. This approach remains a lesser-used technique following early reports of proximal radioulnar synostosis and postoperative elbow instability. Although limited by small case series, recent literature does not support these early reported complications. This study presents a single surgeon's outcomes using the Boyd approach for the treatment of simple to complex elbow injuries. METHODS: Following institutional review board approval, a retrospective review of all patients with simple to complex elbow injuries treated consecutively using a Boyd approach by a shoulder and elbow surgeon was conducted from 2016 to 2020. All patients with at least 1 postoperative clinic visit were included. Data collected included patient demographics, injury description, postoperative complications, elbow range of motion, and radiographic findings including heterotopic ossification and proximal radioulnar synostosis. Categorical and continuous variables were reported using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients were included with an average age of 49 years (range 13-82 years). The most commonly treated injuries were Monteggia fracture-dislocations (32%) and terrible triad injuries (18%). Average follow-up was 8 months (range 1-24 months). Final average elbow active arc of motion was from 20° (range 0°-70°) of extension to 124° (range 75°-150°) of flexion. Final supination and pronation were 53° (range 0°-80°) and 66° (range 0°-90°), respectively. There were no cases of proximal radioulnar synostosis. Heterotopic ossification contributing to less than functional elbow range of motion occurred in 2 (5%) patients who elected conservative management. There was 1 (2%) case of early postoperative posterolateral instability due to repair failure of injured ligaments that required revision using a ligament augmentation procedure. Five (11%) patients experienced postoperative neuropathy, including 4 (9%) with ulnar neuropathy. Of these, 1 underwent ulnar nerve transposition, 2 were improving, and 1 had persistent symptoms at final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest case series available demonstrating the safe utilization of the Boyd approach for the treatment of simple to complex elbow injuries. Postoperative complications including synostosis and elbow instability may not be as common as previously understood.

Rising incidence of stair-related upper extremity fractures among older adults in the United States: a 10-year nationwide analysis.

Upper extremity (UE) fractures are prevalent age-related fractures, and stair-associated falls are a common mechanism for these injuries. Our study has identified an increasing incidence of stair-related UE fractures and associated hospitalization rates among the older United States population between 2012-2021. Targeted prevention efforts should be implemented by health systems. INTRODUCTION: To analyze United States (US) emergency department trends in upper extremity stair-related fractures among older adults and investigate risk factors associated with hospitalization. METHODS: We queried the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) for all stair-related fracture injuries between 2012 and 2021 among adults 65 years or older. The US Census Bureau International Database (IDB) was analyzed to calculate incidence rates. Descriptive analysis, linear regression analysis, and multivariate regression analysis were used to interpret the collected data. RESULTS: Our analysis estimated 251,041 (95% CI: 211,678-290,404) upper extremity stair-related fractures among older adults occurred between 2012 and 2021. The primary anatomical locations were the humeral shaft (27%), wrist (26%), and proximal humerus (18%). We found a 56% increase in injuries (R2 = 0.77, p < 0.001), 7% increase in incidence per 100,000 persons (R2 = 0.42, p < 0.05), and an 38% increase in hospitalization rate (R2 = 0.61, p < 0.01) during the 10-year study period. Women sustained the majority of fractures (76%) and most injuries occurred in homes (89%). Advanced age (p < 0.0001), males (p < 0.0001), proximal humerus fractures (p < 0.0001), humeral shaft fractures (p < 0.0001), and elbow fractures (p < 0.0001) were associated with increased odds of hospitalization after injury. CONCLUSION: Stair-related UE fracture injuries, incidence, and hospitalization rates among older adults are increasing significantly, particularly among older females. Improving bone health, optimizing functional muscle mass, and "fall-proofing" homes of older age groups may help mitigate the rising incidence of these injuries.

Indomethacin for heterotopic ossification prophylaxis following surgical treatment of elbow trauma: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Heterotopic ossification is a frequent complication following surgical treatment of elbow trauma. The use of indomethacin to prevent heterotopic ossification is reported in the literature; however, its effectiveness is controversial. The purpose of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to determine whether indomethacin is effective in reducing the incidence and severity of heterotopic ossification after surgical management of elbow trauma. METHODS: Between February 2013 and April 2018, 164 eligible patients were randomized to receive postoperative indomethacin or placebo medication. The primary outcome was the incidence of heterotopic ossification on elbow radiographs at 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation score, Mayo Elbow Performance Index score, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score. Range of motion, complications, and nonunion rates were also obtained. RESULTS: At 1-year follow-up, there was no significant difference in the incidence of heterotopic ossification between the indomethacin group (49%) and the control group (55%) (relative risk, 0.89; P = .52). There were no significant differences in postoperative Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation, Mayo Elbow Performance Index, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores or range of motion (P = .16). The complication rate was 17% in both the treatment and control groups (P > .99). There were no nonunions in either group. CONCLUSION: This Level I study demonstrated that indomethacin prophylaxis against heterotopic ossification in the setting of surgically treated elbow trauma was not significantly different from placebo.

Including Modifiable and Nonmodifiable Factors Improves Injury Risk Assessment in Professional Baseball Pitchers.

OBJECTIVES: To (1) evaluate an injury risk model that included modifiable and nonmodifiable factors into an arm injury risk prediction model in Minor League Baseball (MiLB) pitchers and (2) compare model performance separately for predicting the incidence of elbow and shoulder injuries. DESIGN: Prospective cohort. METHODS: A 10-year MiLB injury risk study was conducted. Pitchers were evaluated during preseason, and pitches and arm injuries were documented prospectively. Nonmodifiable variables included arm injury history, professional experience, arm dominance, year, and humeral torsion. Modifiable variables included BMI, pitch count, total range of motion, and horizontal adduction. We compared modifiable, nonmodifiable, and combined model performance by R2, calibration (best = 1.00), and discrimination (area under the curve [AUC]; higher number is better). Sensitivity analysis included only arm injuries sustained in the first 90 days. RESULTS: In this study, 407 MiLB pitchers (141 arm injuries) were included. Arm injury incidence was 0.27 injuries per 1000 pitches. The arm injury model (calibration 1.05 [0.81-1.30]; AUC: 0.74 [0.69-0.80]) had improved performance compared to only using modifiable predictors (calibration: 0.91 [0.68-1.14]; AUC: 0.67 [0.62-0.73]) and only shoulder range of motion (calibration: 0.52 [0.29, 0.75]; AUC: 0.52 [0.46, 58]). Elbow injury model demonstrated improved performance (calibration: 1.03 [0.76-1.33]; AUC: 0.76 [0.69-0.83]) compared to the shoulder injury model (calibration: 0.46 [0.22-0.69]; AUC: 0.62 [95% CI: 0.55, 0.69]). The sensitivity analysis demonstrated improved model performance compared to the arm injury model. CONCLUSION: Arm injury risk is influenced by modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors. The most accurate way to identify professional pitchers who are at risk for arm injury is to use a model that includes modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2022;52(9):630-640. Epub: 9 July 2022. doi:10.2519/jospt.2022.11072.

Systematic review of distal biceps tendon rupture in athletes: treatment and rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND: Distal biceps tendon rupture is a rare injury associated with decreased elbow flexion and forearm supination strength. This impairment is not tolerated by high-demand patients like athletes. PURPOSE: To review treatment and rehabilitation applied to injured athletes and study their impact in return to sports. METHODS: MEDLINE, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus online databases were searched. A systematic review was conducted using the PRISMA guidelines; studies published on distal biceps tendon rupture treatment and rehabilitation of athletes until June 30, 2021, were identified. A quantitative synthesis of factor related to return to preinjury sport activity was made. RESULTS: Ten articles were identified, including 157 athletes. Mean age was 40.5 years, and the dominant arm was injured in 103 cases (66%). Rupture was acute in 121 athletes (77%), and the mean follow-up was 25.7 months. A hundred and fifty-three athletes (97.5%) successfully returned to sport within a mean time of 6.2 months. Surgical treatment was followed in all cases. One-incision technique was chosen in 115 (73%) and suture anchor fixation in 52 (33%) cases. No postsurgical immobilization was reported in 38 (24%) and immobilization for 2 weeks in 124 (79%) athletes. Decreased supination-pronation and flexion-extension arc was found in 63 (40%) and 27 (17%) cases, respectively. Earlier return to sport was associated with nondominant-side (P = .007) and acute (P < .001) injuries, participation in weightlifting (P = .001), double-incision approach (P = .005), cortical button fixation (P < .001), and absence of supination-pronation restriction (P = .032). Time of return to sport activity was independent of rehabilitation, including immobilization (P = .539) and strengthening (P = .155), and decreased flexion-extension arc (P = .059). CONCLUSION: Athletes sustaining distal biceps tendon rupture have a high postoperative return to sport rate, independently of selected surgical technique or rehabilitation program. However, a relation between the surgical technique and time of return to sport was found. Rehabilitation did not influence time of return to sport.

The impact of upper-extremity injuries on polytrauma patients at a level 1 trauma center.

BACKGROUND: Upper-extremity injuries often lead to long-term problems in function and quality of life in patients. However, not much is known about the effects in polytrauma patients. This study aimed to describe the upper-extremity injuries in polytrauma patients and to compare self-reported disability and quality of life in polytrauma patients with vs. without upper-extremity injuries. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with an Injury Severity Score ≥ 16 admitted to Erasmus MC between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2016. Patients were asked to complete the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, Short Form 36, and EuroQol-5D questionnaires. Details on injuries, treatment, and clinical outcome were collected from the national trauma registry and medical files. Characteristics and self-reported outcomes of polytrauma patients with vs. without upper-extremity injuries were compared. RESULTS: In a cohort of 3469 trauma patients, 1246 (36.5%) had upper-extremity injuries. Of these, 278 (22.0%) had severe injuries (Abbreviated Injury Scale score ≥ 3). Upper-extremity injuries were associated with a longer hospitalization (median, 12 days vs. 8 days; P < .001), longer intensive care unit stay (median, 5 days vs. 4 days; P = .005), and lower mortality rate (14.6% vs. 23.9%, P < .001). Among the 598 patients who completed the questionnaires, no differences in the physical component summary score (47 vs. 48, P = .181) and mental component summary score (54 vs. 53, P = .315) of the Short Form 36 questionnaire, as well as the utility score (0.82 vs. 0.85, P = .101) and visual analog scale score (80 vs. 80, P = .963) of the EuroQol-5D questionnaire, were found. However, patients with upper-extremity injuries showed a minor increase in disability in the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (9.2 vs. 4.2, P = .023). CONCLUSION: Upper-extremity injuries in polytrauma patients are associated with a longer hospitalization, longer intensive care unit stay, and reduced mortality rate, as well as a minor increase in long-term disability.

Assessment of the interaction effect between injury regions in multiple injuries: A nationwide cohort study in Japan.

BACKGROUND: There have been no clinical studies to sufficiently reveal the interaction effect generated by combinations of injury regions of multiple injuries. We hypothesized that certain combinations of trauma regions might lead to increased risk of traumatic death and aimed to verify this hypothesis using a nationwide trauma registry in Japan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of trauma patients registered in the Japan Trauma Data Bank between 2004 and 2017. We included patients who suffered blunt trauma with an Injury Severity Score of 16 or more. The trauma was classified into four regions (head, chest, abdomen, and extremities), and a multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed that included interaction terms derived from the combination of two regions as covariates. RESULTS: We included 78,280 trauma patients in this study. Among them, 16,100 (20.6%) patients were discharged to death. Multivariable logistic regression showed the odds ratio (OR) of in-hospital death compared with patients without injury of an Abbreviated Injury Scale score of 3 or more in each injured region as follows: head score, 2.31 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.13-2.51); chest score, 2.28 (95% CI, 2.17-2.39); abdomen score, 1.68 (95% CI, 1.56-1.82); and extremities score, 1.84 (95% CI, 1.76-1.93), respectively. In addition, the ORs of the statistically significant interaction terms were as follows: head-chest 1.29 (95% CI, 1.13-1.48), chest-abdomen 0.77 (95% CI, 0.67-0.88), chest-extremities 1.95 (95% CI, 1.77-2.14), and abdomen-extremities 0.70 (95% CI, 0.62-0.79), respectively. CONCLUSION: In this population, among patients with multiple injuries, a combination of head-chest trauma and chest-extremities trauma was shown to increase the risk of traumatic death. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic, Level III.

The impact of COVID-19 on shoulder and elbow trauma: an Italian survey.

BACKGROUND: Because of the rapid spread of COVID-19, on March 8, 2020 Italy became a "protected area": people were told not to leave their homes unless it was essential. The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity of our trauma center, relative to shoulder and elbow, in the 30 days starting from March 8, 2020, the first day of restrictions in Italy, and to compare it with the same days of 2019 to weigh the impact of COVID-19 on shoulder and elbow trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients managed in our trauma center between March 8, 2020, and April 8, 2020 (COVID period), for shoulder and elbow trauma were retrospectively included and compared to patients admitted in the same period of 2019 (no-COVID period). Clinical records of all participants were examined to obtain information regarding age, sex, mechanism of injury, and diagnosis. RESULTS: During the no-COVID period, 133 patients were admitted for a shoulder or elbow trauma; in the COVID period, there were 47 patients (65% less first aid). In the no-COVID and COVID period, patients with shoulder contusion totaled 60 (14.78% of all; male [M]: 34; female [F]: 26; mean age 51.8 years, range 18-88) and 11 (12.09% of all contusions; M: 7, F: 4; mean age 43 years, range 24-60), respectively. In the no-COVID period, 27 fractures (9.34% of all fractures) involved the shoulder, whereas 18 fractures (8.69%) were registered in the COVID period. In the no-COVID period, 14 elbow fractures were treated (4.8% of all fractures), compared with 4 in the COVID period. In the no-COVID and COVID periods, 6 patients (M: 5, F: 1; mean age 42 years, range 21-64) and 2 patients (M: 1, F: 1; mean age 29.5 years, range 24-35) reported having a feeling of momentary post-traumatic shoulder instability, and 0 and 1 patients (M: 1, F: 0; age 56 years), respectively, reported similar symptoms at the elbow. Finally, first or recurrent dislocations in the no-COVID period were 10, and in the COVID period, 7; elbow dislocations in the no-COVID period were 2, and in the COVID period, there were 3. CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID period, we provided a reduced number of health services, especially for patients with low-energy trauma and for those who underwent sports and traffic accidents. However, during the COVID period, elderly subjects remain exposed to shoulder and elbow trauma due to low-energy (domestic) falls. The subsequent hospitalization of these patients has contributed to making it more difficult to manage the hospital wards that are partly occupied by COVID-19 patients.

Arthroscopic arthrolysis leads to improved range of motion and health-related quality of life in post-traumatic elbow stiffness.

BACKGROUND: Post-traumatic elbow stiffness is a frequent and disabling complication after elbow trauma. Surgical release is needed if conservative treatment fails. In contrast to open surgical release, arthroscopic arthrolysis is a good and least invasive option to restore joint mobility. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes, range of motion (ROM), and function of post-traumatic elbow contracture after arthroscopic arthrolysis and to assess health-related quality of life (HRQL). METHODS: Between 2007 and 2013, 44 patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness were treated by arthroscopic arthrolysis and followed up in a consecutive series. Clinical (ROM) and functional analyses (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire [DASH], Mayo Elbow Performance Index [MEPI]) were performed at final follow-up 3 (1-7) years postoperatively. Furthermore, HRQL was evaluated (EQ-5D, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey [SF-36]). DISCUSSION: The average arc of elbow motion increased from 84° ± 28° preoperatively to 120° ± 18° postoperatively. All applied scores significantly improved pre- to postoperatively: the MEPI (59.8 ± 17.3 / 84.3 ± 14.0), DASH (43.5 ± 23.1 / 16.8 ± 15.6), EQ-5D (72.8 ± 16.6 / 84.0 ± 13.6), and SF-36 showed improved results in all categories. Univariate logistic regression revealed that preoperative pain level predicts a poorer postoperative outcome measured with the MEPI score. Revision arthroscopy was needed in 1 case because of persistent pain. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic arthrolysis leads to good clinical and functional results in post-traumatic elbow stiffness regarding ROM, pain relief, functionality, and quality of life. The complication rate as well as the revision rate is very low.

Sport specialization is associated with upper-extremity overuse injury in high school baseball players.

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Sport specialization is increasingly common in youth sports and is a risk factor for lower-extremity overuse injuries. However, limited data exist on whether specialization is associated with upper-extremity (UE) overuse injuries, specifically in youth baseball players. We hypothesized that specialization in baseball and being a pitcher would be associated with poorer arm health and UE overuse injury history in the previous year. METHODS: During the 2019 spring baseball season, 551 high school baseball athletes (aged 15.9 ± 1.3 years) from 3 states (Alabama, n = 200; California, n = 188; and Michigan, n = 163) completed an anonymous questionnaire. Athletes were recruited from 5 high schools in each state, with schools matched based on factors that influence specialization rates. The questionnaire consisted of (1) demographic characteristics, (2) baseball participation information (including sport specialization status), and (3) throwing-arm health and UE injury history in the previous 12 months. Throwing-arm health was assessed using the Youth Throwing Score (YTS), a validated and reliable outcome measure for youth baseball players. Multivariate regression analyses were used to examine the association between variables of interest and the YTS or UE overuse injury history, adjusting for covariates. RESULTS: After adjustment for covariates, highly specialized athletes were more likely to report a UE overuse injury in the previous year compared with low-specialization athletes (odds ratio [OR], 3.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39-10.2, P = .009). Both athletes who reported playing baseball for more than 8 months per year (OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.12-3.65; P = .019) and athletes who reported being a pitcher (OR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.20-3.72; P = .010) were more likely to report a history of UE overuse injury. Highly specialized players reported lower (worse) YTS values compared with low-specialization players (least-squares mean estimate ± standard error, 56.5 ± 1.1 vs. 53.3 ± 0.7; P = .034). Players who reported pitching as one of their positions scored worse on the YTS than non-pitchers (least-squares mean estimate ± standard error, 51.6 ± 0.8 vs. 57.2 ± 0.6; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Although baseball recommendations that discourage sport specialization are widely available for parents, athletes, and coaches, high rates of sport specialization were reported in our sample. We found that being highly specialized in baseball was associated with UE overuse injury history and worse throwing-arm health in high school baseball athletes. Continued education for baseball parents, athletes, and coaches is necessary to raise awareness of the risks associated with high specialization.

Compartment syndrome after distal biceps brachii tendon rupture in an athlete.

This is a case report of a previously healthy athlete who did not use oral anticoagulant, suffered a rupture of the distal biceps brachii tendon, and evolved with arm compartment syndrome. An emergency fasciotomy and the repair of the tendon were performed. After surgery the patient had a good recovery of the paresthesia and sensibility. This complication is rare and, when reported, is usually associated with patients who use anticoagulant therapy. Due to growth of rupture of distal biceps tendon cases, physicians should be aware that this complication must be treated as an emergency.

Effectiveness of the combat application tourniquet for arterial occlusion in young children.

BACKGROUND: Tourniquet use for extremity hemorrhage has become a mainstay in adult trauma care in last 15 years. The efforts of the Stop the Bleed campaign have increased the distribution and use of tourniquets in civilian settings in response to mass shootings and as part of disaster preparedness. Little research or published experience exists regarding the use of tourniquets in the pediatric population. This study sought to determine the minimum patient age on which the combat application tourniquet (CAT) is able to control extremity hemorrhage. METHODS: A convenience sample of pediatric patients, ages 1 year to 8 years, scheduled for elective orthopedic surgery at an academic hospital, were eligible for enrollment. Subject age, weight, height, blood pressure, and arm and leg circumferences were obtained. Once under general anesthesia, the pulse of an upper and a lower limb were obtained by Doppler, a CAT was then placed at the most proximal practical location of the limb until the corresponding pulse was either no longer obtainable by Doppler or until the tourniquet was as tight as its design allows. The tourniquet was removed after 30 seconds of arterial occlusion. RESULTS: Thirteen children, ages 2 years to 7 years were enrolled. Weights ranged from 12.8 kg to 23.9 kg, with a mean of 16.7 kg. Leg circumferences were 24.5 cm to 34.5 cm, with a mean of 27.9 cm and arm circumferences were 13 cm to 24 cm, with a mean of 16.3 cm. Subject heights were 87 cm to 122 cm, with a mean of 103.4 cm. Twenty-four total extremities were tested, 11 arms and 13 legs. Arterial occlusion was obtained on 100% of limbs tested (95% confidence interval, 85.8-100%). CONCLUSION: This study is similar to previous adult tourniquet efficacy studies in design, size and outcomes. It is the first to show successful arterial occlusion on preschool-aged children with a commercial tourniquet in a controlled setting. The results suggest that the CAT can be used in school-aged children with severe extremity hemorrhage with a high likelihood of success. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, level II.

Compartment syndrome after distal biceps brachii tendon rupture in an athlete / Síndrome compartimental em paciente atleta após ruptura do tendão distal do músculo bíceps do braço

ABSTRACT This is a case report of a previously healthy athlete who did not use oral anticoagulant, suffered a rupture of the distal biceps brachii tendon, and evolved with arm compartment syndrome. An emergency fasciotomy and the repair of the tendon were performed. After surgery the patient had a good recovery of the paresthesia and sensibility. This complication is rare and, when reported, is usually associated with patients who use anticoagulant therapy. Due to growth of rupture of distal biceps tendon cases, physicians should be aware that this complication must be treated as an emergency.

RESUMO Relato de caso de paciente atleta, previamente hígido e que não utilizava anticoagulantes orais, com lesão do tendão distal do músculo bíceps braquial, que evoluiu com síndrome compartimental do braço. Realizaram-se fasciotomia de emergência e reparo cirúrgico do tendão, apresentando bom seguimento com recuperação da parestesia e sensibilidade. Essa complicação é bastante rara e, quando relatada, geralmente é associada a pacientes em uso de medicamentos anticoagulantes orais. Contudo, com o aumento da incidência de rupturas do tendão do músculo bíceps braquial, é preciso estar atento à tal complicação que deve ser conduzida como emergência.

Curveballs in Youth Pitchers: A Review of the Current Literature.

As the number of young people playing baseball has increased, so have the number of injuries. Throwing arm shoulder and elbow injuries are most common, and lead to both short and long-term consequences. Recent efforts have been made to identify risk factors for injury with corresponding regulations created to protect youth pitchers. Unlike rules enforcing pitch counts, prohibitions against curveballs are based on minimal objective evidence.

Synovial sarcoma mimicking a traumatic pseudoaneurysm in the upper extremity.

Synovial sarcomas are a rare but aggressive malignancy that primarily affects young patients. Diagnosis is often difficult and delayed due to its insidious onset, heterogenous presentation and mimicry of other pathologies. We present the case of a patient with a history of a slow-growing left arm mass that arose after a traumatic fracture of the humerus. Multimodal imaging was undertaken and reported the mass as being consistent with a vascular malformation of the brachial artery. The patient underwent surgical repair of the artery and intraoperative biopsies confirmed a diagnosis of synovial sarcoma. This case highlights the importance of maintaining suspicion for soft-tissue sarcomas in young patients presenting with a mass, and demonstrates the way in which these tumours may mimic other pathologies both clinically and radiologically. Early referral to a specialist sarcoma centre is key for further investigative workup.

Southampton Arm Fracture Frailty and Sarcopenia Study (SAFFSS): a study protocol for the feasibility of assessing frailty and sarcopenia among older patients with an upper limb fracture.

INTRODUCTION: Falls are a major health problem for older people; 35% of people aged 65+ years fall every year, leading to fractures in 10%-15%. Upper limb fractures are often the first sign of osteoporosis and routine screening for osteoporosis is recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence to prevent subsequent hip fractures. However, both frailty and sarcopenia (muscle weakness) are associated with increased risk of falling and fracture but are not routinely identified in this group. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of assessing and managing frailty and sarcopenia among people aged 65+ years with an upper limb fracture. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will be conducted in three fracture clinics in one acute trust in England. 100 people aged 65+ years with an upper arm fracture will be recruited and assessed using six validated frailty measures and two sarcopenia tools. The prevalence of the two conditions and the best tools to use will be determined. Those with either condition will be referred to geriatric clinical teams for comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). We will document the proportion who are referred for CGA and those who receive CGA. Other outcome measures including falls, fractures and healthcare resource use over 6 months will be collected. In-depth interviews with a purposive sample of patients who undergo the frailty and sarcopenia assessments and healthcare professionals in fracture clinics and geriatric services will be carried out to their acceptability of assessing frailty and sarcopenia in a busy environment. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was given the relevant ethical approvals from NHS Research Ethics Committee (REC No: 18/NE/0377), the University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, and the University of Southampton, Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee and Research Governance Office. Findings will be published in scientific journals and presented to local, national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN13848445.

Surgical intervention and customised dressings in an extremity wound caused by necrotising fasciitis: a case study.

Necrotising fasciitis can result in extensive loss of soft tissue and limb function. Therefore, surgical intervention requires a balance between extensive tissue removal and saving the limb. A 56-year-old male presented with necrotising fasciitis of the upper extremity. Debridement resulted in a full-thickness wound of the forearm and upper arm, an exposed olecranon and two proximally-based skin flaps. Reconstruction required multiple debridements to optimise the wound for skin grafting and to obtain flap adherence to underlying tissues of the upper arm. Conventional dressings over the flaps proved unsuccessful. Therefore, a customised versatile dressing to address each area of the wound was developed. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) was applied over the exposed muscle (no exposed bone or tendon) of the lower arm and anterior upper arm; a hydropolymer foam dressing covered the elbow region. Closed incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPT) was applied over the incision on the posterior upper arm. Ultimately, complete wound closure was achieved, with normal/near-normal range of motion for all joints of the affected limb. There was complete take of skin grafts on the wrist, lower arm and anterior upper arm. ciNPT was effective in holding the incision together and promoting healing of the posterior upper arm, and the hydropolymer foam dressing aided with healing and coverage of the elbow region. In this case, healing of a large, complex upper extremity wound and restored limb function were achieved following use of a combination of surgical techniques and customisation of wound therapy modalities.